During the Q&A of D'Souza's debate with Dan Dennett a questioner completely stumps D'Souza with regards to the Pascal Wager argument he had put forward during the debate. Watch here. I swear that the exact same question popped in to my mind when I heard D'Souza formulate his argument during the debate.
To the untrained eye D'Souza may not appear stumped, because he responds with a tone that would suggest he knows what he's talking about. But in fact what he offers was a total non answer. His response basically had almost no contact with what the questioner had asked. I call that a score.