You decide.
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Google's Pro-Islamic Propaganda
OK, you can't make this stuff up. Bob Dutko has to raise an eyebrow due to Google's logo for today. He says, yeah, maybe he's over reaching. Yeah, maybe it's nothing. But Google has a history of being left wing. They donate money overwhelmingly to Democrats. Don't you find it odd that Google, this organization that has a history of ignoring patriotic holidays, should finally under pressure modify the logo for Veterans Day and do it in such a way that sort of looks like they've created an Islamic crescent? Is this their way of sticking it to us and promoting Islam?
You decide.
You decide.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I'm going to make a point only tangentially related to your post, but related to other of your thought processes. Dutko's show is pretty crappy. He has a lot of silly points about religion and politics that he makes over and over again, and then he finds stories like this one and tries to turn it into news because he has to manufacture something to talk about day to day. He's can be pretty entertaining, but it's like chinese food, after half an hour it's like it never happened. You continue to listen to it though. You would probably prefer to listen to Bob than NPR news. But if you were asked in a poll, "What would you rather listen to, more real and informative news, or crappy right wing religious programming?", you would probably respond "News, of course". But your actions show that you prefer listening to Dutko. This isn't a critisism of you listening to Dutko, by the way. I find myself listening to Limbaugh, Beck and other crappy radio too. But I doubt your answer in a poll would be of much use in determining what you really want to hear.
True, but I think I'm unusual in that way. Who listens primarily to views they disagree with? Not Bob's audience. When I went to see him talk or when I went to see Grady McMurtry I figured I was the only non-acolyte there. I'd love to be in the audience with David Horowitz or maybe Robert Spencer. People that think like me though usually can't take it. It's too aggravating for them.
If your argument depends on everyone else being unlike you then I think you're in trouble. And by the way, I like to read sources I disagree with, and I know several other people that do as well. I would be willing to bet that most people do, but there is no way to prove it, since I just proved that polling data is completely unreliable.
You just proved that polling data is completely unreliable? Where?
On the internet somewhere
Post a Comment