We know how to reduce terrorism to the vanishing point. We know what causes it. The CIA tells us. The US Defense Department tells us. Occupied peoples with few military options resort to terrorism. If you want to stop it you stop occupying. You stop invading.
We're not doing any of that, but the NSA is collecting all of our internet history, the metadata for our phone calls. This much we know. They may be doing more. There's not good evidence that this does much to reduce terrorism. So what's the point?
Chevron wants access to the data of activists that have been working to make it pay for the environmental devastation it has caused. A federal judge has granted Chevron that access. This is what this is really about in my opinion. When you stand in the way of profits you make enemies. Those enemies want another tool to bring you down.
Standing in the way of some profits is what is going to be required to forestall much worse environmental destruction and many more lives lost. It's the only thing that will do it. PRISM, by granting the most powerful corporations access to this data, further expands their power and ability to prevent us from having our voices heard.
1 comment:
Jon,
Interesting post - I'll have to do some digging and let you know my thoughts on this specific case.
In the mean time, I just ran across this article on companies tracking your movement in a store via cell-phone signals.
I work with similar technologies at work quite a bit, and I had no idea they were integrating and using this technology in this way. Pretty crazy...
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/15/business/attention-shopper-stores-are-tracking-your-cell.html?hp&_r=0
Post a Comment